Checked claims about Indiana data-center projects

Evidence limitation: Whether the $25 million was ever written into an executed instrument; the executed agreement, the extension resolutions and any City payment ledger are not in the saved record.

Evidence limitation: The executed agreement and its payment-trigger clauses, the two extension resolutions, which milestones failed and any City payment ledger are not in the saved record; whether any payment was ever due or made is not established.

Evidence limitation: The executed agreement, any separate abatement or deduction instrument (and whether one was ever adopted, claimed or received), the extension resolutions and any payment or abatement ledger are not in the saved record.

Evidence limitation: Whether a NIPSCO agreement was ever executed, and which milestones failed; the executed development agreement, the extension resolutions and any NIPSCO filing for this expansion are not in the saved record.

Evidence limitation: Executed agreement, phase-completion definition, first due date and receipts.

Evidence limitation: Effects outside the reviewed site-specific commitment, including other tariffs, projects and wholesale-market costs, are not established here.

Evidence limitation: Cooling architecture, source water, and permitted or measured withdrawal, consumption, and discharge.

Evidence limitation: Cooling architecture, source water, and permitted or measured withdrawal, consumption, and discharge.

Evidence limitation: Actual annual withdrawal and consumption, potable and nonpotable shares, the heat-rejection architecture used in operation, and operating measurements.

Evidence limitation: The remaining New Carlisle building count, buildout schedule and full-campus completion milestone are not established in the reviewed source.

Evidence limitation: Benefits earned, claimed and received; the meaning of DATA's $611,502,328 Paid/Certified to Date field; whether SEF is executed; RTC status meaning; independently observed jobs and placed-in-service investment.

Evidence limitation: Adopted resolution text and full legal effect; whether the IEDC DATA offer has been executed.

Evidence limitation: Observed employment; whether the 200-by-2032 and 600+ first-phase figures describe the same scope.

Evidence limitation: Final campus scope and completion.

Evidence limitation: Recipient-level awards and payment records.

Evidence limitation: Source water, permitted quantity, current metered withdrawal/consumption, and completion.

Evidence limitation: Eligible-capital, placed-in-service and geographic scope.

Evidence limitation: Annual gross taxes, abatements and net receipts.

Evidence limitation: Project-specific CF-1, payroll definition, count date, residency and contractor treatment.

Evidence limitation: Permit quantity, current metered withdrawal/consumption, source-water mix and completion.

Evidence limitation: Exact unsatisfied milestones.

Evidence basis: city-council projection

Evidence limitation: Observed peak, period and job-years.

Evidence limitation: Operating configuration, total site water and measured consumption.

Evidence limitation: Completed or placed-in-service capital.

Evidence limitation: Operating payroll and delivery schedule.

Evidence limitation: Contracted, energized and measured load.

Evidence limitation: Utility contract and regulatory cost-allocation record.

Evidence limitation: Controlling agreement and exemptions claimed.

Evidence limitation: These records do not freshly confirm the existing facility’s current operating status.

Review limitation: No limitation was recorded in this review. That does not establish that none exists.

Review limitation: No limitation was recorded in this review. That does not establish that none exists.

Evidence limitation: Capacity scope is not classified as critical IT load.

Evidence limitation: Independently reconstructed statewide operating-facility count.