Question reviewed
Answer
Verdict on the wording above: Contradicted Reliable evidence conflicts with the claim as stated (unit, relationship, status or fact). It does not prove bad faith. How verdicts work →
- How it was framed
- A question DataCenterData examined; no one is quoted.
- What the evidence establishes
- No one is quoted saying this; DataCenterData framed and tested the reading. The evidence conflicts with it as worded: Hammond says the separate agreement for the proposed 301 Digital Crossroads expansion expired. June 9, 2025 council minutes identify CoreWeave as an existing tenant at 100 Digital Crossroads Drive.
- Biggest limitation
- These records do not freshly confirm the existing facility’s current operating status.
- Checked
- 11 September 2026 · Next review: no trigger recorded
Evidence
What the evidence supports
Hammond says the separate agreement for the proposed 301 Digital Crossroads expansion expired. June 9, 2025 council minutes identify CoreWeave as an existing tenant at 100 Digital Crossroads Drive. The failed expansion and existing DX-1 site are not the same lifecycle event; the notice does not establish closure of the existing facility.
Still unknown
These records do not freshly confirm the existing facility’s current operating status.
Sources
-
City of Hammond agreement-expiration notice → Archived copy Gov. record
Exact location https://www.gohammond.com/hammond-announces-expiration-of-data-center-development-agreement/
What it supports This source is cited for the record as a whole; no narrower passage was recorded.
-
Hammond Common Council minutes, June 9, 2025 meeting → Archived copy Gov. record
Exact location Page 4, Resolution 25R-16, existing tenancy at 100 Digital Crossroads Drive and proposed 301 project; meeting June 9, 2025, publication date not established.
What it supports This source is cited for the record as a whole; no narrower passage was recorded.
Conflicting evidence
The contradiction is documented in the cited sources listed under Evidence. No separate counterevidence entry has been recorded yet.
Review details
Scope
- Unit
- Entity / lifecycle
- Geography
- Indiana
- Period
- None recorded
- Confidence
- medium
- Kind
- Question reviewed
Chronology
- Published — City of Hammond agreement-expiration notice
- 2 sources retrieved
- Checked by DataCenterData
- Date not established Next review: no trigger recorded
Corrections and history
No corrections or wording changes recorded for this claim.
Data
Suggest a correction
Suggest a correction → Claim ID hammond-facility-closed and this page are prefilled. Accepted material corrections appear publicly on Changes.