Public statement checked
Answer
Verdict on the wording above: Unknown We looked; the reviewed sources do not establish it. Unknown is not zero, not absent, not noncompliant. How verdicts work →
- Who stated it
- Said by the City of Hammond · government record · 22 December 2025 →
- What the evidence establishes
- We looked. The reviewed sources do not establish it. Discussed, not contracted, then the agreement lapsed. The 22 December 2025 minutes record the $25 million as announced but 'Right now it's not part of it'. Unknown is not zero, not absent and not a failure.
- Biggest limitation
- Whether the $25 million was ever written into an executed instrument; the executed agreement, the extension resolutions and any City payment ledger are not in the saved record.
- Checked
- 21 September 2026 · Next review: replacement proposal, new NIPSCO docket or new development agreement · History (2) →
Evidence
What the evidence supports
Discussed, not contracted, then the agreement lapsed. The 22 December 2025 minutes record the $25 million as announced but 'Right now it's not part of it'. The City announced on 1 July 2026 that the development agreement had expired after two extensions. No payment is shown as due or received in the saved record.
Still unknown
Whether the $25 million was ever written into an executed instrument; the executed agreement, the extension resolutions and any City payment ledger are not in the saved record.
Sources
-
Hammond Common Council minutes, 22 December 2025 → Gov. record
Exact location pp. 1–4 ($80 million community-payment total p. 1; $25 million announced p. 2; 'Right now it's not part of it' p. 4); extension resolution at p. 10
What it supports Extension, utility negotiations and noncontractual $25 million discussion.
-
Hammond Announces Expiration of Data Center Development Agreement → Gov. record
Exact location News post body, first paragraph (byline July 1, 2026): 'The City of Hammond announced today that the Development Agreement for the proposed data center project at 301 Digital Crossroads has expired following two previously approved extensions.'
What it supports The development agreement among the City, the Redevelopment Commission, Decennial Group and CoreWeave expired after two extensions because milestones were not satisfied by the 30 June 2026 deadline. The notice does not say which milestones failed, does not show any payment or incentive as due or received, and does not concern the operating DX-1 facility.
Corrections and history
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Additional payment
Field Additional payment
From Previous locator
To pp. 1–4 ($80 million community-payment total p. 1; $25 million announced p. 2; 'Right now it's not part of it' p. 4); extension resolution at p. 10
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 1–2; extension resolution at p. 10'.
Correction · 21 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Additional payment
Field Additional payment
From Minutes say it was not yet in the agreement.
To Discussed, not contracted, then the agreement lapsed. The 22 December 2025 minutes record the $25 million as announced but 'Right now it's not part of it'. The City announced on 1 July 2026 that the development agreement had expired after two extensions. No payment is shown as due or received in the saved record.
Why City of Hammond notice of 1 July 2026: the development agreement expired after two extensions because milestones were not satisfied by 30 June 2026. The authorized terms (Resolution 25R-16, 8–0, 9 June 2025) are now recorded as lapsed; no payment, incentive or NIPSCO agreement is shown in the saved record. Verdict unchanged.
Evidence https://www.gohammond.com/hammond-announces-expiration-of-data-center-development-agreement/ →
Review details
Scope
- Unit
- additional payment
- Geography
- CoreWeave / Digital Crossroads expansion
- Period
- None recorded
- Confidence
- medium — verbal concept in council discussion
- Kind
- Public statement checked
Conflicting evidence
We looked; the reviewed sources do not establish it. That is not zero and not absent. No conflicting record has been logged either.
Chronology
- Stated by City of Hammond
- Published — Hammond Announces Expiration of Data Center Development Agreement
- Changed source locator recorded
- Source retrieved
- Source retrieved
- Changed field recorded
- Checked by DataCenterData
- Date not established Next review: replacement proposal, new NIPSCO docket or new development agreement
Data
Suggest a correction
Suggest a correction → Claim ID claim:coreweave-hammond:additional-payment and this page are prefilled. Accepted material corrections appear publicly on Changes.