Oklahoma index · last changed 13 September 2026

Oklahoma data centers: what the public record shows.

Selected source-linked records are published below. This is not a complete inventory of Oklahoma data centers.

3 sourced policy records for Oklahoma ↓Facility register: 52 records · by county →1 published DataCenterData record · evidence status shown per row51 licensed directory leads · not independently verifiedThese counts overlap and are not added together

Explore Oklahoma

Map, listings and checked facts.

Start with 51 licensed source leads, then inspect the separate public-evidence layer below. Licensed rows are not independently verified and are not a statewide census.

Oklahoma map

Reported locations in Oklahoma

51 licensed rows · 24 source localities · 4 map targets

Open interactive map
Source-reported points; some are approximate. Not parcel boundaries. Exact Approximate or representative Bounded nearby groupA number on a marker is the count of licensed rows it holds.Licensed layer only (Compute Atlas, source data through 14 October 2026). The interactive map lists 64 data-center source listings here across licensed, operator and DataCenterData layers (52 with a map point); 66 with government registry records. Source listings are not distinct sites.2 symbols are offset slightly for readability; thin connectors retain their projected anchors. Open the interactive map for source coordinates.
Browse 4 mapped areas as links
Map sources and method

The state outline is adapted from the U.S. Census Bureau 2025 cartographic boundary file. Facility coordinates are adapted from Compute Atlas by Edward Kubiak, edition 1.34.1, under CC BY 4.0. Outline and markers use one geographic projection before any explicitly disclosed readability offset. Exact singleton source anchors are never moved. A one-kilometre boundary tolerance prevents the simplified 1:20,000,000 outline from hiding legitimate border-area source points; farther conflicts are disclosed, not clamped. DataCenterData groups source-reported city coordinates only within a bounded map radius; the outline does not validate a facility record. Some locations in this layer are reported by the provider as derived from OpenStreetMap (© OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL, https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright) and Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0).

51 licensed rows24 reported city labels38 eligible organization labels

Browse all 51 rows below. Licensed rows are not independently verified and remain separate from the checked public-evidence layer.

  1. source-reported proposedCapacity not statedSource updated 14 September 2026approximate location
  2. source-reported proposedReported planned 4 MWSource updated 2 September 2026approximate location

Separate layer

Also listed by operators

Sites that operators list on their own websites and that are not rows in the licensed directory above. They are kept apart and never added to the licensed rows.

3 operator-listed sites (mixed units; not added to licensed rows) in Oklahoma →

2 of these sites have no supported coordinate. The map does not invent a pin or a metro placement for them.

Oklahoma evidence at a glance

A few checked sites

Selected public evidence, not a statewide census. Each row shows whether it is independently source-linked, attributed, or unresolved; licensed leads remain separate.

Published project / campus
1
Published facility / building
0
Attributed or unresolved rows
0
Licensed directory leads
51 not independently verified
Capacity boundary stated
0 of 1 published DataCenterData rows
Review timing
Audit through 12 September 2026 · next 12 March 2027
Known coverage gap

Oklahoma's statutory data center sales tax incentive and any recipient or certification list were not examined; the only lead to them, a Frontier article, was not yet reviewed directly.

Browse all 51 Oklahoma licensed leads → · Why these counts differ →

Projects

1 project record. Names are as they appear on each record page.

Projects published for Oklahoma
Record / rolesStatusCapacity / scalePrimary evidence
Meta Tulsa Data CenterOperator: Meta constructionproject UnknownNo independently supported figureThe government source gives no data-center MW value. More than 1,500 MW in the release concerns separate clean-energy projects adding energy to Oklahoma's grid, not this data center's IT capacity, service capacity, request or measured load. Meta Breaks Ground on New $1 Billion Data Center in Tulsa →Gov. record

Where the records were checked

Statewide audit pending

A few checked sites

This is not a list of every data center in the state, and the number here is not a count of them. There are almost certainly more.

Statewide coverage is not complete. The records below are sourced; a full statewide count has not been published.

State research audit window ended 12 September 2026. Individual records and claims below show their own evidence dates and may be newer.

Next scheduled coverage review: 12 March 2027.

1 independently source-linked project/campus record; 0 independently source-linked facility/building records; 0 attributed or unresolved rows. These counts use different units and must not be added together.

Source families checked, selected records and remaining gaps

These notes name selected records, say which kinds of public evidence were checked and show what remains missing. They do not add anything to the published counts.

  • Economic development incentives — Partly checked
    • Oklahoma's statutory data center sales tax incentive and any recipient or certification list were not examined; the only lead to them, a Frontier article, was not yet reviewed directly.
    • the current review did not include a broad discovery sweep for Oklahoma, so no search engine query could be run for this state; every source was reached by following a Compute Atlas source URL or by constructing an agency URL directly.
    • Oklahoma Department of Commerce incentive programme reports, Quality Jobs Program records and the Oklahoma Tax Commission ad valorem exemption reports were not reached.

    Selected records

  • Utility commission and large-load records — Partly checked
    • Case Processing Online is an Oracle APEX application that returns only a shell to a plain fetch, so no Oklahoma cause number, filing, tariff or order was read.
    • No PSO or OG&E large-load tariff, special contract or electric service agreement was obtained.
    • The Southwest Power Pool interconnection and large-load queues were not examined at all, so no Oklahoma research lead carries an interconnection figure.

    Selected records

  • Environmental and construction permits — Partly checked
    • deq.ok.gov failed secure connection certificate verification, so no air permit, permit application, public notice, water or construction permit was read.
    • Behind-the-meter generation at Oklahoma data centers, which the Governor's remarks in an operator release describe as enabled by new legislation, could not be checked against any permit.
    • No municipal building or grading permit portal was reached for any Oklahoma city.

    Selected records

  • Local planning, assessor and map records — Checked
    • Only one city, Piedmont, was worked at the municipal level. Tulsa, Oklahoma City, Stillwater, Muskogee, Owasso, Claremore, Coweta, Inola, Lawton and Alva were not.
    • No county assessor or GIS parcel record was opened; the parcel account numbers recorded come from a PUD design statement, not from the assessor.
    • The Piedmont planning agenda packet, annexation petition and conceptual site plan published on the same portal were not yet reviewed directly.
    • Whether either Piedmont PUD was approved by the city council is not established; no minutes or approving ordinance was found.

    Selected records

  • Tax abatements and development agreements — Partly checked
    • No statewide Oklahoma registry of local development agreements or abatements was located, so this family cannot be swept the way Texas can.
    • The Springboard Tax Incentive Agreement itself is referenced in the plan with a blank date and was not obtained, so no executed agreement is in evidence.
    • Five-year ad valorem manufacturing exemption records held by the Oklahoma Tax Commission were not reached.

    Selected records

  • Operator disclosures — Partly checked
    • Google, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services and Oracle location pages were not yet reviewed directly for Oklahoma.
    • No colocation operator page (TierPoint, TulsaConnect, RACK59, ValorC3, Isocentric, OCOSA) was opened.
    • Only one SEC filing was retrieved; IREN, Potentia and Jericho Energy Ventures filings naming Oklahoma sites were not.

    Selected records

  • Open datasets and directories — Checked
    • Data Center Map, Baxtel, datacenters.com, Cloudscene and PeeringDB were not consulted.
    • dcmap.us is cited by several Compute Atlas Oklahoma records and was not yet reviewed directly.
    • About 16 Oklahoma records, mostly Tulsa and Oklahoma City colocation halls, were read but not worked up as research leads.

    Selected records

  • Closures, withdrawals and former names — Partly checked
    • No primary cancellation, withdrawal or rescission record was obtained for any of the three; all three withdrawals rest on the dataset alone.
    • No archived operator page, acquisition filing or demolition record was searched for Oklahoma.
    • Renames and acquisitions were not systematically checked; the Core Scientific acquisition of Polaris DS LLC was found incidentally and remains unresolved against the Polaris Technologies facility.

    Selected records

  • News and other discovery — Partly checked
    • No Oklahoma news source was opened at all.
    • Local reporting on the Piedmont, Stillwater, Owasso and Coweta projects, which would carry hearing dates and vote outcomes, was not reached.

    Selected records

Local evidence by place

Licensed and operator listings, reviewed records, answers and local policy for each place. Listings overlap and are not added; a place without a line here has no published local evidence.

No local evidence answer, reviewed record or local policy record is published for Alva, Amber, Chouteau, Claremore, Council Hill, Coweta, Enid, Inola, Kiowa, Piedmont. Their listings above are source listings to investigate. No statewide evidence answer is published for Oklahoma either; statewide rules are under Policy tracker below.

Policy tracker

Oklahoma policy records

3 sourced records are associated with this state context. They are grouped below as current, pending and nonbinding, and history, and each card shows its relevant date. These are not facility counts and do not cover every locality.

Current 2 records

Recorded as in effect on the dataset date. This does not mean every project in a represented state is restricted or approved.

Enacted legislation or regulation

Data Center Customer Ratepayer Protection Act of 2026 (HB 2992)

In effect · Oklahoma · State

Effective: 1 July 2026

Issuing authority: Oklahoma Legislature

Oklahoma's HB 2992 requires separate electric-service terms and tariffs for new data centers and certain other new large loads of at least 75 megawatts, assigns their costs under cost-causation principles, and generally requires a service term of at least ten years.

Read the sourced record · Primary source · Archived copy (2 September 2026)

Pending or nonbinding 1 record

Adopted measures with unverified effect, adopted future measures, open proceedings, proposals, drafts and nonbinding context stay separate from current rules.

Federal and multistate

Federal and multistate instruments that cover all or part of Oklahoma

These federal, reliability-organization and multistate grid or utility instruments are stored once and listed for every jurisdiction they name. They do not add to the record count, in-effect total or map shading for Oklahoma. Territorial coverage does not establish that an instrument applies to any particular site, utility or project.

Enacted legislation or regulation · Listed coverage: part of Oklahoma

Southwest Power Pool: Conditional High Impact Large Load Service accepted by FERC (ER26-1323)

In effect · Southwest Power Pool region (multistate) · Regional grid

Effective: 1 July 2026

Issuing authority: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

On 5 June 2026 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission accepted Southwest Power Pool tariff revisions, effective 1 July 2026, that add Conditional High Impact Large Load Service, a non-firm transmission service that can serve a large load such as a data center before long-term firm service is available, for up to seven years and subject to curtailment.

Read the sourced record · Primary source

Enacted legislation or regulation · Listed coverage: part of Oklahoma

Southwest Power Pool: High Impact Large Load study processes accepted by FERC (ER26-247)

In effect · Southwest Power Pool region (multistate) · Regional grid

Effective: 15 January 2026

Issuing authority: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

On 14 January 2026 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission accepted Southwest Power Pool tariff revisions, effective 15 January 2026, that add a High Impact Large Load study process and a generation assessment for those loads.

Read the sourced record · Primary source

Open the Oklahoma policy comparison

Review dates: the 3 Oklahoma records were last checked 23 September 2026 to 30 October 2026. 2 scheduled reviews are overdue as of the tracker date 3 November 2026: Data Center Customer Ratepayer Protection Act of 2026 (HB 2992) (last checked 24 September 2026, review due 24 October 2026); Commerce sheet on tax incentives available to data centers (last checked 23 September 2026, review due 23 October 2026). Overdue means not re-read yet, not changed. No single record, and not this list, establishes complete statewide policy coverage.