Claims
A verdict applies only to the wording shown.
Company claims are shown as stated; they are not findings.
Entity / lifecycle · IN · digital-crossroads-hammond
ContradictedCommon reading; no one is quoted
Checked 11 September 2026
The expiration of Hammond's CoreWeave agreement means the existing Digital Crossroad data center closed.
What the evidence supports
Hammond says the separate agreement for the proposed 301 Digital Crossroads expansion expired. City records identify CoreWeave as an existing tenant at the operating 100 Digital Crossroads facility. The failed expansion and existing DX-1 site are not the same lifecycle event.
Still unknown
None recorded
expansion design · IN · coreweave-hammond
OutdatedSaid by City of Hammond (government) on 2025-06-10 in City of Hammond.
Checked 11 September 2026
450,000 square feet; 180 MW; contemplated 20-year CoreWeave lease
What the evidence supports
Development agreement expired; expansion not delivered.
Still unknown
Exact unsatisfied milestones.
permanent jobs · IN · coreweave-hammond
OutdatedSaid by City of Hammond (government) on 2025-06-09 in City of Hammond.
Checked 11 September 2026
35 to 90 jobs paying more than $75,000
What the evidence supports
Not delivered; due status not established.
Still unknown
None recorded
community impact payments · IN · coreweave-hammond
OutdatedSaid by City of Hammond (government) on 2025-06-09 in City of Hammond.
Checked 12 September 2026
Up to $4 million per year for 20 years
What the evidence supports
Not shown due or paid.
Still unknown
Executed agreement and payment-trigger clauses.
additional payment · IN · coreweave-hammond
UnknownSaid by City of Hammond (government) on 2025-12-22 in City of Hammond.
Checked 12 September 2026
$25 million lump sum discussed
What the evidence supports
Minutes say it was not yet in the agreement.
Still unknown
None recorded
incentives · IN · coreweave-hammond
OutdatedSaid by City of Hammond (government) on 2025-06-09 in City of Hammond.
Checked 12 September 2026
10-year construction abatement and 20-year 100% technology deduction
What the evidence supports
Claimed or received amounts not established.
Still unknown
None recorded
power agreement · IN · coreweave-hammond
UnknownSaid by City of Hammond (government) on 2025-06-09 in City of Hammond.
Checked 12 September 2026
Final NIPSCO agreement explicitly described as gating
What the evidence supports
No executed agreement located; exact failed milestones undisclosed.
Still unknown
None recorded
existing facility · IN · coreweave-hammond
Company claimSaid by Digital Crossroad (company) in Digital Crossroad Indiana data center page.
Checked 10 September 2026
DX-1 operating; operator publishes 105,000 square feet and up to 20 MW
What the evidence supports
DX-1 operating; operator publishes 105,000 square feet and up to 20 MW
Still unknown
Capacity scope is not classified as critical IT load.
History
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Expansion design
Field Expansion design
From Previous locator
To pp. 3–11 (resolution 25R-16 introduced p. 3; lease, jobs, tax terms and community impact payment p. 4; NIPSCO contingency p. 6)
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 3–4'.
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Permanent jobs
Field Permanent jobs
From Previous locator
To pp. 3–11 (resolution 25R-16 introduced p. 3; lease, jobs, tax terms and community impact payment p. 4; NIPSCO contingency p. 6)
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 3–4'.
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Community impact payments
Field Community impact payments
From Previous locator
To pp. 3–11 (resolution 25R-16 introduced p. 3; lease, jobs, tax terms and community impact payment p. 4; NIPSCO contingency p. 6)
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 3–4'.
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Community impact payments
Field Community impact payments
From Previous locator
To pp. 1–4 ($80 million community-payment total p. 1; $25 million announced p. 2; 'Right now it's not part of it' p. 4); extension resolution at p. 10
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 1–2; extension resolution at p. 10'.
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Additional payment
Field Additional payment
From Previous locator
To pp. 1–4 ($80 million community-payment total p. 1; $25 million announced p. 2; 'Right now it's not part of it' p. 4); extension resolution at p. 10
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 1–2; extension resolution at p. 10'.
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Incentives
Field Incentives
From Previous locator
To pp. 3–11 (resolution 25R-16 introduced p. 3; lease, jobs, tax terms and community impact payment p. 4; NIPSCO contingency p. 6)
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 3–4'.
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Incentives
Field Incentives
From Previous locator
To pp. 1–4 ($80 million community-payment total p. 1; $25 million announced p. 2; 'Right now it's not part of it' p. 4); extension resolution at p. 10
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 1–2; extension resolution at p. 10'.
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Power agreement
Field Power agreement
From Previous locator
To pp. 3–11 (resolution 25R-16 introduced p. 3; lease, jobs, tax terms and community impact payment p. 4; NIPSCO contingency p. 6)
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 3–4'.
Correction · 11 September 2026 · DataCenterData review
coreweave-hammond → Power agreement
Field Power agreement
From Previous locator
To pp. 1–4 ($80 million community-payment total p. 1; $25 million announced p. 2; 'Right now it's not part of it' p. 4); extension resolution at p. 10
Why 2026-09-11: previously 'pp. 1–2; extension resolution at p. 10'.
What changed
Council approves the development agreement
The power agreement is explicitly described as gating. The city’s approval notice says the project is contingent on a NIPSCO power agreement and the subsequent execution of the contemplated 20-year CoreWeave lease.
First extension discussed and approved
Utility negotiations continue. A separate $25 million payment is discussed but is not yet in the agreement.
Extended deadline passes
After two extensions, required obligations and milestones remain unsatisfied. The city does not name the exact failed milestones.
City announces expiration
Hammond says it will grant no further extension. The notice concerns the proposed project at 301 Digital Crossroads and does not address DX-1, which its operator still markets.
Source packet
- Hammond Common Council minutes — 9 Jun 2025 →Primary municipal PDF · pp. 3–11 (lease, jobs, tax terms and community payment p. 4; power contingency p. 6) · proposal, lease, jobs, tax terms, community payment and power contingency
- Hammond Common Council minutes — 22 Dec 2025 →Primary municipal PDF · pp. 1–4 and resolution at p. 10 · extension, power negotiations and noncontractual $25M discussion
- City of Hammond — development agreement approval notice →Primary municipal announcement · project contingent on a NIPSCO power agreement and lease execution; CoreWeave “180-megawatt facility” quote
- City of Hammond — expiration notice →Primary municipal outcome record · 1 Jul 2026
- Digital Crossroad — existing DX-1 facility →Operator source · current facility status, published area and capacity
- Machine-readable claim ledger →DataCenterData normalization · version 0.2
- Classification methodology →Why an unsatisfied precondition is not automatically a missed payment
Data + actions
Suggest a correction → Record ID coreweave-hammond and the page are prefilled. Accepted material corrections appear on Changes.