A verdict applies only to the wording shown.
Company claims are shown as stated; they are not findings.
Documented fact
Verdict on the wording above: Not yet due
Said by the City of Gilroy · Gilroy Data Center
Review scope: City of Gilroy Data Center General Q&A page and fact sheet captured 3 November 2026
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Whether the 23 acre-feet is a Phase 1 figure, as the Q&A says, or a full-buildout figure, as the fact sheet says; measured potable or recycled water use after opening; the recycled-water volume; the recycled-water agreements' terms and whether they were completed; the Water Supply Assessment (the page lists it as Appendix O of the environmental review, not read); and the conditions-of-approval text.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 3 November 2026
Question reviewed
Verdict on the wording above: Contradicted
Question examined by DataCenterData · Iowa
Review scope: Board communication read 1 November 2026
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Microsoft's actual daily or annual water use in the West Des Moines system, the signed and dated agreement (the attachment is the form with a blank effective date), and whether the limitation period has ended.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 1 November 2026
Question reviewed
Verdict on the statement above: Supported
Question examined by DataCenterData · Global AI (Colorado), LLC Data Center Project
Question: Does GlobalAI’s Weld County project need only 6,500 gallons of water a year?
Answer to the question: The complaint filed October 6 says GlobalAI represented that its closed-loop cooling system would require a 65,000-gallon initial fill and 6,500 gallons of annual replenishment. The plaintiffs allege that total water demand—including other site uses and periodic refills—was not quantified. The filing describes a cooling-replenishment figure, not a verified total for annual site water use.
Evidence and limits
Supported refers to this reading of the complaint. It does not verify the company’s figures, total site water use, the plaintiffs’ allegations or a court finding.
This is a party’s description of the Phase 1 application. Original applicant records and total site water demand were not reviewed.
Evidence limitation: These are a litigating party's descriptions and allegations about the Phase 1 application. The underlying applicant documents, hearing record, approval conditions and water-service agreements were not reviewed. Nothing here establishes measured use, total future demand, filing authenticity through the court docket, present litigation status or a court finding.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 12 October 2026
Public statement checked
Verdict on the wording above: Company claim
Said by Google · Texas
Review scope: Google PDF and blog checked 1 October 2026
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Measured withdrawal, consumption, discharge, or make-up water. Whether the air-cooling design is built. What the $10 million fund spends, and where.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 1 October 2026
Documented fact
Verdict on the wording above: Supported
Said by Chesterfield County · Google Bermuda Hundred Data Center Campus
Review scope: Chesterfield table as of July 2026
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Current measured withdrawal or consumption; operator and title-owner legal roles; reconciliation of 2100 versus 2400 and 2700 Bermuda Hundred Road.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 21 September 2026
Question reviewed
Verdict on the wording above: Unknown
Question examined by DataCenterData · Google Fort Wayne
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Cooling architecture, source water, and permitted or measured withdrawal, consumption, and discharge.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 16 September 2026
Public statement checked
Verdict on the wording above: Company claim
Said by Google · Google The Dalles
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Site-specific cooling design, cooling-water source, and measured data-center withdrawal, consumption, and discharge.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 16 September 2026
Question reviewed
Verdict on the wording above: Unknown
Question examined by DataCenterData · Meta Jeffersonville
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Cooling architecture, source water, and permitted or measured withdrawal, consumption, and discharge.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 16 September 2026
Public statement checked
Verdict on the wording above: Company claim
Said by Microsoft · Microsoft Mount Pleasant
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Operating configuration, initial-fill volume, other site water uses, and measured withdrawal, consumption, and discharge.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 16 September 2026
Question reviewed
Verdict on the wording above: Unknown
Question examined by DataCenterData · Meta Lebanon
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Actual annual withdrawal and consumption, potable and nonpotable shares, the heat-rejection architecture used in operation, and operating measurements.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 14 September 2026
Public statement checked
Verdict on the wording above: Company claim
Said by Google · Google New Albany campus
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Independent utility/meter corroboration; cooling share; peak-day demand; operators other than Google.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 12 September 2026
Public statement checked
Verdict on the wording above: Supported
Said in US EPA case study · Microsoft Quincy
Review scope: EPA observations spanning operation from 2021, 2022 connection status and early-2023 context
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Current measured withdrawal, consumption and discharge; a reconciled explanation of Microsoft's separate 380-million-gallon estimate; and operating changes after EPA's dated observations.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 12 September 2026
Question reviewed
Verdict on the wording above: Unknown
Question examined by DataCenterData · Ohio
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Independent utility/meter records; cooling-only share; peak-day demand; operators other than Google's company-reported 2025 campus rows.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 12 September 2026
Question reviewed
Verdict on the wording above: Contradicted
Question examined by DataCenterData · Ohio
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Individual permits for named data-center outfalls were not inventoried. An individual NPDES permit is permission, not measured discharge or proof of compliance.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 12 September 2026
Question reviewed
Verdict on the wording above: Unknown
Question examined by DataCenterData · AWS New Carlisle
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Source water, permitted quantity, current metered withdrawal/consumption, and completion.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 11 September 2026
Public statement checked
Verdict on the wording above: Company claim
Said by AWS economic-development manager · AWS New Carlisle
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Permit quantity, current metered withdrawal/consumption, source-water mix and completion.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 11 September 2026
Public statement checked
Verdict on the wording above: Company claim
Said by Meta · Meta Lebanon
Evidence and limits
Evidence limitation: Operating configuration, total site water and measured consumption.
Read the answer and sources →
Checked 11 September 2026