Water & cooling · OH

Treating New Albany's no-additional-capacity statement as proof that facility-level water impact is negligible.

A verdict applies only to the wording shown.

Question reviewed

Answer

Verdict on the wording above: Unknown We looked; the reviewed sources do not establish it. Unknown is not zero, not absent, not noncompliant. How verdicts work →

How it was framed
A question DataCenterData examined; no one is quoted.
What the evidence establishes
We looked. The reviewed sources do not establish it. The city says it has not needed additional water capacity because of data centers. That city page still does not provide facility-level withdrawals. Unknown is not zero, not absent and not a failure.
Biggest limitation
Independent utility/meter records; cooling-only share; peak-day demand; operators other than Google's company-reported 2025 campus rows.
Checked
12 September 2026 · Next review: no trigger recorded

Evidence

What the evidence supports

The city says it has not needed additional water capacity because of data centers. That city page still does not provide facility-level withdrawals. Google later published company-reported 2025 campus figures for New Albany, Lancaster and Lockbourne; those remain company claims with third-party limited assurance, not municipal meter audits. Independent utility/meter records, cooling share and peak-day demand remain missing for other operators.

Still unknown

Independent utility/meter records; cooling-only share; peak-day demand; operators other than Google's company-reported 2025 campus rows.

Sources

  1. City of New Albany data-center information → Archived copy Gov. record

    Exact location https://datacenters.newalbanyohio.org/

    What it supports City says it has not needed additional water capacity because of data centers. That is not facility-level metered withdrawal, consumption, discharge or peak-day demand.

    Publication date unavailable · Accessed

Review details

Scope

Unit
Water / capacity
Geography
Ohio
Period
None recorded
Confidence
medium
Kind
Question reviewed

Conflicting evidence

We looked; the reviewed sources do not establish it. That is not zero and not absent. No conflicting record has been logged either.

Chronology

  1. Source retrieved
  2. Checked by DataCenterData
  3. Date not established Next review: no trigger recorded

Corrections and history

No corrections or wording changes recorded for this claim.

Data

This claim as JSON →

Suggest a correction

Suggest a correction → Claim ID new-albany-water-capacity and this page are prefilled. Accepted material corrections appear publicly on Changes.