$25 million lump sum discussed
Limit: Evidence basis: verbal concept in council discussion
Claims · by operator
Checked claims about CoreWeave projects
7 checked claims so far about projects whose record names CoreWeave as operator or developer. “About” is not “said by”: 1 were said by a company and 6 are common readings or statements by others. Not a count of CoreWeave facilities.
7 claims · newest check first
A verdict applies only to the wording shown.
Company claims are shown as stated; they are not findings.
Up to $4 million per year for 20 years
Limit: Executed agreement and payment-trigger clauses.
10-year construction abatement and 20-year 100% technology deduction
Limit: Evidence basis: city-council description
Final NIPSCO agreement explicitly described as gating
Limit: Evidence basis: city-council record
450,000 square feet; 180 MW; contemplated 20-year CoreWeave lease
Limit: Exact unsatisfied milestones.
35 to 90 jobs paying more than $75,000
Limit: Evidence basis: city-council projection
DX-1 operating; operator publishes 105,000 square feet and up to 20 MW
Limit: Capacity scope is not classified as critical IT load.
What this covers. 7 checked claims so far about CoreWeave projects. They concern data-center projects in Indiana (7). That is because those are the CoreWeave claims DataCenterData has checked, not a count of claims or of data centers. Where a state, operator, project or topic shows no checked claim, read it as “not yet checked by DataCenterData”.
What a verdict means. A verdict applies only to the wording shown and the evidence linked on the check date. “Unknown” means the reviewed evidence did not establish the point; it never means zero or false.
All 50 checked claims and what they cover → · Corrections log →