Claims · by operator

Checked claims about Amazon Web Services projects

9 checked claims so far about projects whose record names Amazon Web Services as operator or developer. “About” is not “said by”: 6 were said by a company and 3 are common readings or statements by others. Not a count of Amazon Web Services facilities.

All evidence checks → · Search and filter → · Corrections

9 claims · newest check first

A verdict applies only to the wording shown.

Company claims are shown as stated; they are not findings.

Public statement checked

Up to $98.3 million is the sum of the four listed credit/grant programs and excludes the separately authorized 50-year sales-and-use-tax exemption, whose value is not stated here.

Verdict on the wording above: Supported

Said by the Indiana Economic Development Corporation · AWS New Carlisle

Evidence and limits

Evidence limitation: Benefits earned, claimed and received; the meaning of DATA's $611,502,328 Paid/Certified to Date field; whether SEF is executed; RTC status meaning; independently observed jobs and placed-in-service investment.

Read the answer and sources →

Checked 12 September 2026

What this covers. 9 checked claims so far about Amazon Web Services projects. They concern data-center projects in Indiana (9). That is because those are the Amazon Web Services claims DataCenterData has checked, not a count of claims or of data centers. Where a state, operator, project or topic shows no checked claim, read it as “not yet checked by DataCenterData”.

What a verdict means. A verdict applies only to the wording shown and the evidence linked on the check date. Where a separate question appears beside a statement checked, the verdict is about that statement, and the question has its own answer. “Unknown” means the reviewed evidence did not establish the point; it never means zero or false.

All 90 checked claims and what they cover → · Corrections log →