Claims · by verdict

Checked claims with the verdict “Unknown”

We looked; the reviewed sources do not establish it. Unknown is not zero, not absent, not noncompliant. 11 checked claims so far carry this verdict; that is an outcome of what we checked, not a scoreboard. How this verdict is defined →

All evidence checks → · Search and filter → · Corrections

11 claims · newest check first

A verdict applies only to the wording shown.

Company claims are shown as stated; they are not findings.

Public statement checked

$25 million lump sum discussed

Verdict on the wording above: Unknown

Said by the City of Hammond · CoreWeave / Digital Crossroads expansion

Evidence and limits

Evidence limitation: Whether the $25 million was ever written into an executed instrument; the executed agreement, the extension resolutions and any City payment ledger are not in the saved record.

Read the answer and sources →

Checked 21 September 2026

Public statement checked

Final NIPSCO agreement explicitly described as gating

Verdict on the wording above: Unknown

Said by the City of Hammond · CoreWeave / Digital Crossroads expansion

Evidence and limits

Evidence limitation: Whether a NIPSCO agreement was ever executed, and which milestones failed; the executed development agreement, the extension resolutions and any NIPSCO filing for this expansion are not in the saved record.

Read the answer and sources →

Checked 21 September 2026

Question reviewed

What electricity-system costs has the Sabey Indianapolis petitioner committed to cover, and does that establish statewide customer protection?

Verdict on the wording above: Unknown

Question examined by DataCenterData · Sabey Decatur Technology Park

Evidence and limits

Evidence limitation: Effects outside the reviewed site-specific commitment, including other tariffs, projects and wholesale-market costs, are not established here.

Read the answer and sources →

Checked 21 September 2026

What this covers. 11 checked claims so far with the verdict “Unknown”. They concern data-center projects in Indiana (8), Ohio (2) and Virginia (1). A verdict distribution is an outcome of what we happened to check, not a scoreboard: it says nothing about claims we have not checked. Where a state, operator, project or topic shows no checked claim, read it as “not yet checked by DataCenterData”.

What a verdict means. A verdict applies only to the wording shown and the evidence linked on the check date. Where a separate question appears beside a statement checked, the verdict is about that statement, and the question has its own answer. “Unknown” means the reviewed evidence did not establish the point; it never means zero or false.

All 90 checked claims and what they cover → · Corrections log →