DTE Electric service territory, Michigan

MPSC Case U-21990: rehearing and reopening of Saline data center contracts denied

Enacted legislation or regulation

In effect This instrument is recorded as currently in effect as of the dataset date.

Scope

The Michigan Public Service Commission's order of 27 March 2026 in Case No. U-21990 denies the petitions for rehearing filed by the Michigan Department of Attorney General, by the Michigan Environmental Council, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Sierra Club and Citizens Utility Board of Michigan, and by the Great Lakes Renewable Energy Association; denies the Attorney General's motion to reopen; and denies the Attorney General's motion for a contested proceeding, in the case concerning DTE Electric's special contracts to serve a 1.383-gigawatt data center facility in Saline Township. The order records that DTE Electric filed its acceptance letter on 15 January 2026.

Geographic scope
DTE Electric service territory, Michigan
Jurisdiction
State
Authority type
Regulator or commission
Issuing authority
Michigan Public Service Commission

Dates

Adopted
27 March 2026
Effective
Effective date not stated in the source
Scheduled expiration
None scheduled
Ended
Not recorded as ended
Completion condition
None stated
Source document
27 March 2026
Last checked
23 September 2026 (earlier than tracker date 5 October 2026; not an automatic status change)

Summary

On 27 March 2026 the Michigan Public Service Commission denied petitions for rehearing, a motion to reopen and a motion for a contested proceeding in Case No. U-21990, leaving in place its 18 December 2025 conditional approval of DTE Electric's special contracts to serve a 1.383-gigawatt data center facility in Saline Township. The order found that concerns raised about DTE Electric's 15 January 2026 acceptance letter did not require reopening.

What this does not establish

  • This is a decision on rehearing, reopening and a contested proceeding; the contract approval and its conditions are in the 18 December 2025 order, which is a separate record.
  • The effective date of the order is not stated in its text; the adoption date is the Commission meeting date.

Unresolved questions

  • Whether an appeal of the Case No. U-21990 orders to the Michigan Court of Appeals, reported in April 2026, is pending; the court docket was not opened because courts.michigan.gov disallows automated access in its robots.txt.

Relationships

Supersession means a later instrument replaces the earlier legal effect. Repeal links identify the repeal instrument and the measure it ends. A later implementation or related letter is not treated as a replacement unless the record says so.

Sources

Primary source

https://adms.apps.lara.state.mi.us/Mpsc/ViewCommissionOrderDocument/27396

    Back to the policy tracker ยท Michigan policy module