Facility or project event · Variance approved · Official record

Variance approved on 18 March 2026: Sabey — Decatur Technology Park (Indianapolis, IN) — development commission hearing results dated 18 March 2026

The Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission approved, subject to commitments, petitions 2025-CAP-856 (modification of commitments) and 2025-CVR-856 (2nd Amended, variances for a data center technology park) filed by Sabey Data Center Properties, LLC for Kentucky Avenue/Camby Road parcels.

What this is. The source (development commission hearing results, dated 18 March 2026) dates this variance approval to 18 March 2026. This event does not establish any later stage.
Event date
Hearing results for the MDC hearing of Wednesday, March 18, 2026.
Source dated
Document header 'Hearing (March 18, 2026) … MDC HEARING RESULTS'; PDF metadata shows it was created 2026-03-20.
Source accessed
Retrieved by DataCenterData; not an event date.
Added to Latest updates
When this entry entered the updates log; not an event date.
Event type
Variance approved · Approvals
Evidence basis
Official record · Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission
Confidence
HighDecision, petition numbers, petitioner and date are all in the commission's hearing results.
State
Indiana
Linked records
Sabey — Decatur Technology Park sabey-indianapolis
Linked claims
Unknown: “What electricity-system costs has the Sabey Indianapolis petitioner committed to cover, and does that establish statewide customer protection?”

What the source says

Approved 2025-CAP-856, subject to commitments. Approved 2025-CVR-856 (2nd Amended), subject to commitments.

Where: PDF p. 2, 'Petitions for Public Hearing', item 8 (companion petitions recommended for approval by hearing examiner, appeal filed by remonstrator)

Source: Metropolitan Development Commission Hearing (March 18, 2026) – MDC Hearing Results

Internet Archive copy (captured 21 September 2026)

What this does not establish

  • Construction start
  • Final approval certification
  • Operation

Still unknown

  • Whether the required commitments were filed (MDC rule VIII.5.A: not finally approved until filed)
  • Whether the remonstrator sought judicial review
  • Construction timing

Identifiers

Event ID 47df8e9d236d5fd3c5b12422d59da3fc463a91e280c203633dde2185b252f482. The ID is derived from the event itself and never changes. A later correction would be published as a separate, linked entry.

Report a problem with this entry →

All latest updates →